Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
(permission requested for use) Please click on The New York Times banner and
subscribe today!)
The following is an editorial from The New York Times, online edition, June
25, 2005
Educating Girls
The wish list of the world's poorest families is long. They need to grow more
crops and start more businesses. They need to have smaller families, healthier
and better educated children and safer pregnancies and births. They need to
fight AIDS and protect women and children from domestic violence. There is one
program that will help achieve these goals and more: educating girls. When officials
of the richest countries meet next month at the Group of 8 summit, they should
strongly consider a large investment in schooling for girls.
Worldwide, 58 million school-age girls are deprived of education. In rural Africa,
about 70 percent of girls do not finish primary school. In some countries, a
girl is 20 percent less likely to start school than her brother is.
Girls benefit tremendously from education, and so do the societies around them.
But, especially in rural or traditional societies, parents need daughters to
help in the house. They are often afraid to send girls on unsafe walks to faraway
schools.
Perhaps most important, in many places girls become part of their husband's
family when they marry, so parents of an educated girl do not reap the benefits
of her higher income and skills. These cultures have a saying: educating your
daughter is like watering your neighbor's garden. Since parents in many places
must pay for school fees, books and uniforms, they often send only their boys.
But countries have begun to notice that educating women provides amazing social
benefits, from better health to a better economy. They have begun programs to
encourage girls to start and stay in school. The most direct way is to make
education cheaper - nations that have eliminated school fees have had their
schools flooded with girls. In Uganda, attendance soared from 2.5 million to
6.5 million children, most of them girls, after fees were abolished in 1997.
Other nations give cash payments or bags of wheat to families for attending
school. In other places, building schools in each community so students can
travel less is the solution.
The Save the Children charity recently ranked Bolivia as the country that has
made the most improvement in girls' education. In 1995, Bolivia instituted sweeping
reforms, with special attention to rural girls. Families received cash incentives.
Schools got more teachers who speak indigenous languages, and revamped schedules
to provide vacations during harvests. Bolivia has since closed the gender gap
and the number of students completing primary school rose to 78 percent from
10 percent.
Three years ago, rich countries and organizations promised countries with similarly
thoughtful and transparent plans that money would be no obstacle. Nearly 40
countries have such plans, but sadly, the money hasn't materialized. Since attracting
girls means hiring more teachers, poor governments are unwilling to get started
until they know they can rely on the money to pay salaries.
Next month's meeting of the G-8 can fix this. Some $5 billion in new money a
year is needed to help meet the goal of universal education. So far, the Bush
administration has been resisting calls to commit more money to Africa. But
Laura Bush is a passionate advocate of girls' education. She should convince
her husband that there are few better bargains.
Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company