
(you can purchase this poster on evolvefish.com
- look for the "poster" link)
WHAT IS EVOLUTIONARY FEMINISM?
"Jesus was the original feminist."
from the novel, The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown, p. 248
Well, that is a good question. Nothing yet is written in stone, but
there are some of us who are trying to define this sub-discipline because
we know it does exist, and we know it should have its own separate "location"
to grow. Just consider this location as fertile ground in which this meme
can grow.
At its core, evolutionary feminism is the belief that since the "meaning of life" is seeking solutions to "how to pass one's genes into the next generation," it is the female, and not the male, that is ultimately responsible for the direction that that our species follows. Since the responsibility of reproduction flows through her body, the "female choices" that she takes determines our species course.
This is good news and bad news.
This confirms that the female must be, not only free to make her own choices determining her progency's future fate, but those choices include the female of the past picking agressive and destructive males as "helpers" in raising children.
As a sort of preview, let us give you some guiding principles;
we have yet to flesh out the details, so be patient, and let these four items
serve merely as guideposts.
1st principle: Females do not form coalitions
that attack their own species; only males. Overwhelming empirical and historical
evidence teaches us that of the 4,000 mammal species on the planet, only two
form coalitions to attack their own species. Those two are the (Pan troglodytes)
chimpanzees, and (Homo sapiens) humans; in both species, it is only
the males that organize and attack. Not once, in recorded history, has the
female been noted in this organized activity.
2nd principle: Female choice. Females are the
path of our species regeneration. Rejecting the biblical past, evolutionary
feminists do not believe that their bodies are receptacles for the male sperm,
but are equally important in the dual role of passing genes to the future.
It is paramount that the female always, always has freedom to chose her mate
of choice and has control of her body. Thus, if the female has only a limited
choice of males, (i.e., fundamentalist Muslins or Evangelical Christians)
she will evaluate mate selection based mainly on resource assessments surrounding
those males at the time and location of her selection.
3rd principle: The female is equally competitive
in the reproductive process alongside the human male. In an important moment
in evolutionary feminism comes from the pen of Anne Campbell in her 2002 book,
A Mind of Her Own: the evolutionary
psychology of women
| "Women have been parodied as the gentle sex in convenient opposition to the belligerent male. Men compete, women do not. Men must compete for sex but what is there for women to compete for?...women must compete for all those requirements that ensure their reproductive success. Competitive reproductive success. When push comes to shove and there is not enough to go around, I am afraid that it must be my progeny, not yours in the next generation. But I will avoid outright violence if I can. Why? Because without me, the chances of my children surviving drop disastrously and offspring survival is the prize that is at stake. Female competition may look different from that of males, but that does not mean that it does not exist. We are competitors - and good ones." P. 310. |
This raises an intriguing question: If the female is equally competitive,
why is it only now known? Why has it taken humankind its' entire history to
reach this finding? That intriguing question leads us to the fourth principle:
4th principle: Genes and Culture interact
with each other, with culture contributing the greater influence. Although
we are biological creatures, and the goal is to pass our genes, before we
mate physically, we must find a way to solve that biological problem by first
learning the social norm rules that surround us. As a species, we have determined
that living in groups is best for our survival and that means that we must
conform to a consensus that forms around us concerning those behaviors. Those
behaviors are controlled by ruling elites who also form and transmit social
norms of behavior. Those who follow those elites must be acceptable to those
who dominate and control those memes. If we fail to follow those rules, it
might mean that we could be banished from the dominate inner circle in which
we live. In most cases, if the female choices to live freely outside that
circle, (if she can) that means limited resources available for the female
to raise her progeny. In most cases, all of us, including the fertile female
of reproductive age, chooses to follow the social norms, even if it appears
to be against her best interests.
To answer the intriguing question as to why it took this long for
humanity to discover this truth of equal competitiveness? Because the female
majority, up till now, has concluded that the present "institutions"
established, and the lessons learned within those institutions (marriage,
social groups that one identifies with, friends, family, racial, ethnic, etc.),
were the best possible way to pass their genes into the next generation; there
has been no need in the past to change the evolutionary process. Now, with
the planet on the verge of destroying itself, dominated by males with support
of their female supporters, perhaps the sex that controls the reproductive
process is having second thoughts.
**************************************
Always remember:
"Only two species of mammals have ever been observed to form aggressive coalitions against other members of their own species: Chimpanzees and humans. The male of our species has recurrently engaged in warfare over recorded human history, whereas, there is not a single documented case of women forming same-sex coalitions to go to war. " David Buss quoting Tooby and Cosmides (The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies, Technical Report #88-1, 1988)
**************************************
Notable quote: James
Watson, co-discoverer of DNA, when asked how we as a society are going to
react to issues raised by genetics -- stem cells, bioengineering, and the
like: "Just let all genetic decisions be made by women."
Discover Magazine, July 2003, p. 19
************************
Are you ready to begin studying the subject of feminism from an evolutionary perspective as presented by several writers?
Women,
Power, and the Biology of Peace
By
Judith L. Hand, Ph.D.
Book review by William A. Spriggs, January 28th, 2008
Redefining
Seduction: Women Initiating Sex, Courtship, Partnership, and Peace
By
Donna Sheehan & Paul Reffell
Book Review by William A. Spriggs, December 31, 2007
Female
Intrasexual Competition:
Toward an Evolutionary Feminist Theory
by K.M. Ingo, Colorado State University - Pueblo, K. D. Mize,
Florida Atlantic University, M. E. Pratarelli, Colorado State University -
Pueblo,
ISSN: 1527-5558 2007. Placed on web site, C: Dec 9th, 2007
Menstrual
Odors, Dirty Diapers, and the Male Dominated Religious Quest for Purity:
Giving Birth to Misogyny, Racial, and Ethnic Discriminations
Originating in the Human Biological Emotion of Disgust.
Essay by William A. Spriggs, Origin June 20th 2007
Bare
Branches: The Security Implications of Asia's Surplus Male Population
By Valerie M. Hudson & Andrea M. den Boer
Latest book review by William A. Spriggs,
Origin: October 2006
"The masculinization of Asia's
sex ratios is one of the overlooked stories of the century…This phenomenon
may be only one example of the linkage between the status of women in society
and the society's possibilities for democracy and peace." P. 264.
The
Da Vinci Code Yes, its the novel by Dan Brown
that you most likely have read. Now re-read it with the eyes of an evolutionary
feminist. "Jesus was the original feminist."
P. 248. Review by William A. Spriggs, August 28th, 2006
Educating
Girls,
A New York Times editoral, June 25, 2005, with permission
from The New York Times,
Fearing
Future, China Starts to Give Girls Their Due
by Jim Yardley, January 31, 2005, (With permission from
The New York Times, Feb. 2005)
Book review: The
Wimp Factor: Gender Gaps, Holy Wars, & the Politics of Anxious Masculinity
By Stephen J. Ducat. A review by William A. Spriggs, October 28, 2004
Book Review: The
Rules: Time-tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right by Ellen
Fein and Sherrie Schneider. Review by William A. Spriggs, October 3, 2004
Book Review: The
Curse: Confronting the Last Unmentionable Taboo: Menstruation By Karen
Houppert. Review by William A. Spriggs, August 21, 2004
Book Review:.A Mind of
Her Own: Evolutionary Psychology of Women by Ann Campbell. Review by William
A. Spriggs, July 22, 2004
Sexual Selection: A Tale of Male Bias
and Feminist Denial, by Griet Vandermassen, Jan. 2004
Book Review: Women's Roots:
The History of Women in Western Civilization, by William A. Spriggs, October
2003.
Evaluating Some Feminist Accounts
of Gender, by Griet Vandermassen, June 2003.
Cherly and Leona: An Almost Typical American
Couple A Short Piece That Understands That Political
Power is Used as an Instrument of Subordinate Control in the Quise of "Morality."
By William A. Spriggs, Feb. 2003
Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology,
by Sophia Elliott Connell, Circa., 2000. A blistering attack on Evolutionary
Psychology in particular, and the resulting fallout in perspectives concerning
feminism in general. OK, boys and girls, Ms. Connell has raised some important
questions concerning the wide-reaching effect of the evolutionary perspective
that need to be answered before we move forward.
Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology: Can
They be Reconciled? by S.L Hurley, Circa., 1999. Although
written before the blistering attack on evolutionary psychology by Ms. Connell,
it seems like Ms. Hurley has a better grasp on the science because she takes
the road combining nature vs. nuture; it is neither one or the other, but
once again, it's about 60% nuture, 40% nature (very rough estimates).
Do
You Know the Ten Variations of Feminism? A list complied
from the book, A Mind of Her Own: Evolutionary Psychology of Women,
Book Review: Woman: An Intimate Geography
by Natalie Angier. Review by Jennifer Goehring, Nov. 1999.
Further Notes on Marriage, Monogamy, and
Sexual Modesty by Jennifer Goehring, June 1999.
The Evolutionary Perspective of Women, Sex, and Monogamy: Setting the Record
Straight by Jennifer Goehring, April 1999.
Men, Women, Sex and Darwin
by Natalie Angier, (With permission from The New York Times)Feb. 1999.
Modern Standards of Beauty: Nature
or Nurture: An Evolutionary Perspective? by Jennifer
Goehring, Jan. 1999.
Fukuyama's Follies: So What if Women
Ruled the World? A response to Frances Fukuyama by Barbara
Ehrenreich, Katha Pollitt, et al. Jan/Feb., 1999. (With permission from Foreign
Affairs).
Chivalry is not Dead by
Jennifer Goehring, Dec. 1998.
Women and Evolution by
Jennifer Goehring, Sept. 1998.
Women and the Evolution of
World Politics by Francis Fukuyama, (With permission
from Foreign Affairs, Sept/Oct 1998)
FEMINIST READINGS WITH EMPHASIS ON BIOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CUTURAL PERSPECTIVES
VARIOUS
FEMINIST LINKS OF IMPORTANCE
Copyright, Evolution's Voyage, 1995 - 2008